国际资讯2026-07-15About 9 min read3 viewsSource · The Spirits BusinessEditor · jiu欣闻jiu翻译整理,供参考
美国酒类行业协会质疑俄勒冈州玻璃容器环保收费新规
多家美国酒类贸易组织联合对俄勒冈州新实施的「生产者延伸责任」(EPR)制度中玻璃容器收费方案提出法律质疑。该制度要求饮料生产商为其使用的玻璃包装支付回收处理费用,行业协会认为该费用结构不公平地加重了小型酒厂和进口商的负担,违反了州际商业条款。此案可能为其他州类似环保法规的制定提供重要判例参考。
The Distilled Spirits Council of the US (Discus) is urging a court to review Oregon’s Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) scheme for 'unfairly' imposing high glass costs for producers.
Trade bodies Discus and Wine Institute filed a legal document with the Portland division of Oregon’s District Court as part of a lawsuit between the National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors, and Leah Feldon, director of Oregon’s Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). The trial commenced yesterday (13 July). The trade groups have voiced their concerns over Oregon’s EPR programme, claiming it ‘penalises glass packaging, disproportionately burdens wine and spirits producers, and violates the Commerce Clause’. Introduced in July 2022, the state’s EPR scheme charges producers fees based on packaging weight, meaning glass will have a higher charge than plastic containers. The filing explains that a standard 750ml glass bottle for wine or spirits faces fees more than eight times higher than a plastic bottle of the same size, despite glass being highly recycled, particularly in Oregon. “Wine and spirits producers support meaningful recycling and sustainability policies, but those policies must be fair, workable and grounded in how these products are actually made, packaged and sold,” said Discus chief legal officer Courtney Armour. “Oregon’s current approach places a disproportionate burden on products packaged in glass, even as glass has long been one of the state’s recycling success stories.” Discus and Wine Institute also argue the scheme goes against the Commerce Clause as many distilleries and wineries outside of Oregon would have to pay the full cost of the programme. There are currently exemptions for many local small producers covered under Oregon’s Bottle Bill. The trade bodies also pointed out it would be challenging for producers to make price adjustments on a state-by-state basis, meaning manufacturers may decide to pass increased costs to consumers across the country, rather than only in Oregon. According to Discus and Wine Institute, Oregon's DEQ has acknowledged concerns regarding the treatment of glass under the state's EPR programme. In 2026, the DEQ explored options for cutting costs for glass producers while maintaining Oregon's successful glass collection and recycling system. Oregon became the first state to fully implement a packaging EPR programme, while California, Colorado, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota and Washington have also enacted similar laws. Separately, a coalition of 17 state attorneys general has filed a federal lawsuit challenging California's EPR law. Across the Pond, the UK introduced its EPR scheme in April 2025, however it has faced criticism from trade groups and major spirits producers. In other Oregon news, Diageo recently closed the Aviation Gin visitor centre in Portland just three years after opening the site.Comments
New comments are reviewed before they appear.
No published comments yet.
Sign in to comment. Log in
